At Luru, we work with companies of varying sizes and at varying stages. There are cases where we fit perfectly. Cases where we don’t. We’ve tried to analyze this - is it the stage of the company, the industry, or the company size? What we’ve found is that two metrics consistently help clarify whether an AI SDR is the right fit:
- TAM (Total Addressable Market): How large is the pool of potential leads your company can target?
- CAC Payback Period: How long does it take for you to recover your customer acquisition costs?
These two metrics form the foundation of a simple framework that I’ve seen work time and again.
The Framework
Think of a 2x2 grid. On one axis, you have TAM: small vs. large. On the other, CAC Payback Period: short vs. long. Each quadrant tells a different story about whether an AI SDR is the right fit.
1. AI SDR: A Must
(Large TAM, Short CAC Payback)
If your TAM is large and your CAC payback is much shorter, an AI SDR is a game-changer. Businesses in this quadrant often operate at a scale where manual processes can’t keep up. AI helps qualify leads, book meetings, and keep the pipeline moving, allowing the team to focus on closing deals. One of our customers in SaaS hit this sweet spot - their sales team’s productivity doubled within three months of adopting our AI SDR platform.
2. AI SDR: Relevant
(Large TAM, Long CAC Payback)
In this scenario, you still need efficiency, but every dollar spent matters. AI SDRs are a great fit if you’re focused on lead nurturing, ensuring that the sales team only spends time on the most promising prospects in the near future. For one of our enterprise customers, this balance meant leveraging AI to keep building the pipeline for the future.
3. AI SDR: Optional
(Small TAM, Short CAC Payback)
This is where things get more nuanced. If your TAM is small but your CAC payback period is short, AI SDRs might not be essential. When the TAM is limited, extremely well-planned human reachouts often yield better results. One of our customers in a niche B2B market opted for manual, highly personalized outreach, reserving AI only for supporting research - and the occasional nudge.
4. AI SDR: Not a Fit
(Small TAM, Long CAC Payback)
For businesses with a small TAM and a long payback period, investing in an AI SDR is unlikely to deliver ROI. In these cases, I’ve seen teams achieve much better results by focusing on refining their ICP (Ideal Customer Profile) and doubling down on targeted, human-led engagement. The goal here isn’t automation; it’s about making every conversation count.
Lessons from the Field
While the field of AI SDRs is still young, I’ve already seen that context is everything. AI SDRs aren’t a one-size-fits-all solution. They’re incredibly powerful in the right scenarios but can fall flat if forced into situations they’re not designed for.
It’s also a CAC game. AI SDRs need to justify their cost, and timing matters. Do you retrieve your CAC early enough to make automation worth it? For example, one of our customers in the fintech space had a large TAM and a short CAC payback period, which made the deployment of an AI SDR a no-brainer. Within months, they saw an 80% reduction in manual outreach time while maintaining high-quality prospecting. The cost of the AI SDR was quickly offset by the faster deal cycles and increased pipeline efficiency.
On the other hand, a small B2B company with a highly niche market struggled to see results. Their TAM was limited, and their CAC payback took over 18 months. In their case, investing in carefully planned human reachouts with highly tailored messaging proved far more effective - and far less costly.
My Rule of Thumb
When I’m advising customers, I always focus on three key considerations:
- Does your TAM demand scale? If your Total Addressable Market is large, AI SDRs can handle the volume and maximize efficiency in a way manual processes can’t.
- Can you retrieve your CAC within a reasonable payback period? It’s a math game - what you invest versus what you get in your pipeline and how quickly that happens determines if AI SDRs make sense.
- Is your TAM small but high-value? In cases where the market size is limited, highly personalized and human-driven outreach often provides better results than automation.
These three considerations often reveal whether deploying an AI SDR is a smart move or if alternative approaches will yield better outcomes.
Closing Thoughts
If you’re considering an AI SDR, this framework is a good place to start. It’s not about jumping on a trend - it’s about finding the right tool for your team’s specific challenges. And if you’re unsure where you fit on the grid, let’s have a conversation. Some of the best insights I’ve gained have come from understanding the unique needs of our customers.
In the end, it’s not just about using AI - it’s about using it wisely.
.svg)
